Apr 18, 2025 at 6:24 PM#16
PharmHunterJen said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. Posting only so the count is not one.
Last edited: Apr 18, 2025 at 7:24 PM
15 13RegAffairsDC, BiostatsBrad, PeptideSynthNJ and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 19, 2025 at 2:02 AM#17
quinn_sf said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.
16 14tom_AK, josh_phd_bmore, roxy_nash and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 19, 2025 at 9:40 AM#18
quinn_sf said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Correct, and worth adding that it is reversible. Nothing being described here is a one-way door, which changes how cautious it is reasonable to be.
17 15tony_orlando, Dr.NephBHM_UK, kim_atl_prep and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsApr 19, 2025 at 5:18 PM#19
quinn_sf said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
Saving this. It is the first explanation that did not require me to already understand it. Taking it to my next appointment.
18 16CryptoCarl, MariaRD, AussieAnna and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report