Dr.LeslieOBGYN said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
Coming at Dr.LeslieOBGYN’s question from a different direction. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
One concrete data point for the thread. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference Standardsjason_paloalto said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
jason_paloalto said:If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself.
Correct as far as it goes. The part it does not cover is what to do when the honest answer is "not enough data", which is more often than anyone likes.