dan_philly said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.
dan_philly said:If you are comparing against somebody else’s result, check that you are comparing the same measurement taken the same way.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsDeniseRN_TPA said:Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale.
DeniseRN_TPA said:Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals.
Coming at DeniseRN_TPA’s question from a different direction. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.