TrialTracker_MD said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Pushing back on TrialTracker_MD here. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
TrialTracker_MD said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
TrialTracker_MD said:One habit that pays for itself: post the method alongside the number.
Genuinely useful, thank you. I had the facts and not the framework. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsClinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
sean_dublin said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Mine went the same way, slower. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.