Mar 26, 2024 at 2:31 AM#16
julia.endo said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
33 8ricardo_MIA, BrianDallas92, labquiet_amy and 30 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 26, 2024 at 4:37 PM#17
Dr.NateNeph said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.
Last edited: Mar 26, 2024 at 8:37 PM
32 7GenomicsKate, Dr.ObesityMed, HealthEcon_DC and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Mar 27, 2024 at 6:42 AM#18
Dr.NateNeph said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
Agreed on the substance. I would put less weight on the timescale, because two months of anything is not enough to distinguish a trend from a wobble.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
31 6Dr.EndoIndy, tom_AK, josh_phd_bmore and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsMar 27, 2024 at 8:47 PM#19
Dr.NateNeph said:The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the…
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes.
Last edited: Mar 27, 2024 at 11:47 PM
30 5wanda_boise, NurseAsh_DET, BenResearch_OR and 27 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report