Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:
What did you change at the same time, and can you separate the two now?
Dr.GastroMayo said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
Pushing back on Dr.GastroMayo here. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsDr.GastroMayo said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.