wanda_boise said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. Not convinced. The evidence being cited is consistent with the conclusion and also consistent with two other conclusions nobody has ruled out.
wanda_boise said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
No disagreement, though the timescale matters more than the mechanism here. Most of what looks like a difference in kind turns out to be a difference in how long somebody waited.
wanda_boise said:For the archive: it took about six weeks rather than the two I expected, and the difference between those two numbers was the whole of my problem.
That reframing is the part I needed. I will report back once I have actually tried it.
Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesGL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer
Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemAdding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
Dr.LipidDallas said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.