gary_naperville said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
Pushing back on gary_naperville here. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
gary_naperville said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
True, and it depends on a baseline nobody has stated. Without knowing where someone started, the same number can be an excellent result or a disappointing one.
gary_naperville said:Resolved, and the thing that resolved it was the least interesting suggestion in the thread.
Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFrom the other side of the consultation, briefly. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.
PharmHunterJen said:Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then…
Same pattern here, and in the same order. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.