Dr.NateNeph said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Agreed, and one caution: a single measurement is not a measurement. Anything that moves day to day needs a trend before it means anything at all.
LarryQC_SD said:Agreed on the target, with the caveat that reference weight and current weight are different numbers.
This answered a question I did not know how to ask.
Dr.NateNeph said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
I read this differently from Dr.NateNeph, on substance rather than tone. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsThe figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. If you are going to change something, change one thing and give it long enough to express itself. Four weeks is the usual minimum for anything pharmacological on this board, and two weeks of data has told you almost nothing.