raj_cambridge said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
Worth saying that the confident version of this is more useful to the person writing it than to the person reading it.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.
raj_cambridge said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
That holds where the measurement is reliable. Where it is noisy — and a lot of what gets tracked here is noisy — the same reasoning produces confident nonsense.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsClinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
Dr.EndoIndy said:It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.