paige_pharma said:On a suppressed appetite the winning strategy is protein density per unit of volume, not per calorie.
DEXA scan update relevant to protein intake:
Scanned at months 0, 6, and 12. Here are the body comp numbers:
| Baseline | Month 6 | Month 12 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total mass | 262 lbs | 217 lbs | 199 lbs |
| Fat mass | 102 lbs | 82 lbs | 49 lbs |
| Lean mass | 155 lbs | 145 lbs | 156 lbs |
| Body fat % | 39% | 31% | 23% |
Lean mass preserved — actually GAINED 1-2 lbs thanks to progressive overload + 1.5g/kg protein. The protein intake discussion needs to include body comp data, not just scale weight.
Following on from TrialTracker_MD — and this may be the naive question:
How people are hitting a protein target on a genuinely suppressed appetite, because volume is the binding constraint rather than willingness?
lucas_SP_BR said:DEXA scan update relevant to protein intake: Scanned at months 0, 6, and 12.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third retelling.
PeptideDetective — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsClosing the loop on my own question.
Update: two thirds of the target before midday. Same total, same appetite, and I am hitting it most days now.
Dr.DermMIA said:Most of what circulates confidently in this community traces back to one summary of one study, and the qualifier was dropped somewhere in the third…
Agreed on the target, with the caveat that reference weight and current weight are different numbers. Using current weight at the start of a large loss produces a target that is both unachievable and unnecessary.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.